Read on Twitter
On 21/09/2020 @uksciencechief said on TV
“The way we reduce spread is by limiting our number of contacts, bu reducing contacts in environments where spread is more likely. Those are crowded environments, indoor environments, poor ventilation “ https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/chief-scientific-advisor-and-chief-medical-officer-briefing-on-coronavirus-covid-19-21-september-2020--2
“The way we reduce spread is by limiting our number of contacts, bu reducing contacts in environments where spread is more likely. Those are crowded environments, indoor environments, poor ventilation “ https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/chief-scientific-advisor-and-chief-medical-officer-briefing-on-coronavirus-covid-19-21-september-2020--2
Yet @educationgovuk guidance to schools allows
-bubbles of 300
-interchanging classes of 30
-no masks in classrooms
-no SD
-no ventilation monitoring
Wash your hands and open a window are the main components of the mitigations in schools!
-bubbles of 300
-interchanging classes of 30
-no masks in classrooms
-no SD
-no ventilation monitoring
Wash your hands and open a window are the main components of the mitigations in schools!
MPs, journalists and public figures have mostly (with VERY few exceptions) chosen to ignore this.
Instead there’s been a concerted effort to GASLIGHT A NATION
“Schools are safe” remember but it’s the mixing of households that causes them to be vectors of transmission!
Instead there’s been a concerted effort to GASLIGHT A NATION
“Schools are safe” remember but it’s the mixing of households that causes them to be vectors of transmission!
When the public inquiry happens, I hope each and every MP, public figure and journalist who has been complicit in the shameful treatment of parents, pupils and school staff who ACTUALLY FOLLOWED THE SCIENCE and questioned the illogical guidance are held to account.
No one irrespective of age or occupation should be unnecessarily and KNOWINGLY exposed to increased risk of infection!
That is not morally or LEGALLY acceptable.
That is not morally or LEGALLY acceptable.
Ask yourself what your role has been?
Have you questioned the logic of in-person education continuing without the recognised science based safety measures?
Have you remained silent?
Have you questioned the logic of in-person education continuing without the recognised science based safety measures?
Have you remained silent?
Or worse, have you actively pushed for full return without mentioning that safety measures are required?
What a legacy you have created for yourself if you’ve done this! You will be remembered in the history books of tomorrow as one of the people who ignored the science!
What a legacy you have created for yourself if you’ve done this! You will be remembered in the history books of tomorrow as one of the people who ignored the science!
