Great post by @Sherman1890 got me thinking about the future of targeted ads.

More and more tools (privacy labels, ad blockers, GDPR) enable consumers to opt-out from targeted ads - can limit the data platforms receive or block ads altogether.

The end of targeted ads? đŸ§”đŸ‘‡ https://twitter.com/Sherman1890/status/1359091971755810816
Many assume that data extraction and targeted ads are a cost to consumers (note that all ads are to some extent targeted🧐) .

It isn't, and doesn't have to be, this way.

For instance, there is significant room for targeted ads to improve. This might already be happening 👇
2) Ads can also be a form of entertainment - think of trailers before a movie.

This seems to be what Instagram Influencers are all about.

You go to Insta for entertainment, and brands get new consumers. Could be even better with more precise targeting. https://locowise.com/blog/how-influencers-are-switching-up-the-travel-industry
3) My Google feed is my own personalized newspaper. Made to fit my preferences.

More data could lead to better targeting =>better matches, and higher chance that I really enjoy the promoted pieces (which is good for me AND for advertisers). https://www.blog.google/products/search/feed-your-need-know/
5) Some normative points:

- Data extraction ≠ consumer harm: Better ads can benefit all parties (and data extraction has many other benefits).

- Combining data from different sources/products is valuable =>Policymakers should not ban this.

- Let people vote with their feet.
In short, regulators would be wrong to strangle the targeted ad industry, or to systematically minimize data extraction.

Consumers should be able to choose targeted products/services if they prefer them!
You can follow @AuerDirk.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.