Read on Twitter
Nobody pays any attention.
British teeth and American teeth are in equally poor oral health. There is no validity to the argument that adding bioavailable #fluorine to our diet prevents tooth decay. If it did, British teeth would be much worse than American teeth. The facts are shown. #DealWithIt
Circular citations are just opinions. Larry says Harry agrees, and Mary told him that, and she depended on what Harry and Larry said the other day...
The stats from 2018
https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/statistics/2018stats.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/statistics/2018stats.htm
States with the Best & Worst Dental Health https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-best-worst-dental-health/31498
Seeing this table, how can anyone still assume that adding bioavailable #fluorine to our diet (and watershed) has any effect on the oral health of the citizens? <table sorted by percent F'd, descending>
Kentucky cannot get more #fluoridated. Yet it is ranked ninth worst in oral health. They get more "care" in Mississippi than in West Virginia, yet the Magnolia state is still dead last. Montana (30.7%F'd) ranks higher than Arkansas (85.4%F'd). These numbers show the facts.
