It's quite remarkable to see the extent of serious engagement with the public comment process at the fb @OversightBoard re: Trump's account
Here's a strong letter from, amongst others, @rickhasen, @davidakaye and @alexstamos
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000177-8e40-df6c-abf7-ae726a9b0000
Here's a strong letter from, amongst others, @rickhasen, @davidakaye and @alexstamos
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000177-8e40-df6c-abf7-ae726a9b0000
Things I'm curious about:
1. If the decision goes against public comment, will that discourage future participation?
2. Level of intl engagement
3. If future overseas cases can also garner such considered engagement (I sure hope so!)
1. If the decision goes against public comment, will that discourage future participation?
2. Level of intl engagement
3. If future overseas cases can also garner such considered engagement (I sure hope so!)
Really starting to regret not putting my comment on letterhead... https://twitter.com/unc_citap/status/1359931288879251457
It’s honestly amazing how many thoughtful and serious submissions there are https://twitter.com/cendemtech/status/1359966549944238094
It’s possible there might be a few unserious ones too.... https://twitter.com/viacristiano/status/1359921255571476484
Adding this submission to this thread too, given it's a must read https://twitter.com/jameeljaffer/status/1359970721540243463