Yes Civilization VI features Global Warming, but in terms of an overall climate perspective it could be a bit less ... utilitarian.
The same applies to Rainforests. Why keep them at all? For defense boni. Perhaps. Or turn them to farmland!
And marshes. Civilization VI (2016) does not seem to know their CO2-draining function in the ecosystem. This still proclaims the terraforming impetus inherited from its first predecessor Civ I of 25 years before.
A bit further down the manual, it becomes quite clear that as Civilization advances, nature has to go. You have to feed your people, don't you?
But as all Civilitation titles since II (1996), Civilization VI (2016) still offers a solution to one decisive environmental problem: nuclear fallout! Well, you can't have a decent thermonuclear war if you could not clean up afterwards, can you?
You can follow @t_winnerling.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.