Read on Twitter
Meanwhile in other news, wow ...
Arconic internally withdrew their Class B classification for PE ACM (which was approved for buildings over 18m) and replaced it with Class E.
Debbie French doesn't recall seeing this email, and claims she wouldn't have noted the relevance ...
Arconic internally withdrew their Class B classification for PE ACM (which was approved for buildings over 18m) and replaced it with Class E.
Debbie French doesn't recall seeing this email, and claims she wouldn't have noted the relevance ...
... because she only viewed the Class 0 classification as important for the UK market.
But it seems Reynobond had used the Class B classification to convince the BBA that the PE ACM could be considered to be Class 0, so it's very important.
But it seems Reynobond had used the Class B classification to convince the BBA that the PE ACM could be considered to be Class 0, so it's very important.
Having said that, Reynobond could have then just gone off and tested the PE ACM to BS 476/6+7 and got the Class 0 that way.
I should've pointed out the date on the email and its relevance to the Grenfell refurbishment
