The research on ACEs has powerfully increased awareness about the lifetime impact of adversity in childhood. The growing commitment to preventing child trauma is welcome - but let’s respond in the right way.

2/
We must not overstate the extent to which experiencing ACEs are predictive of future outcomes. ACE scores are NOT a way of deciding who needs support or what kind of support an individual might need.

3/
And we can’t assume that raising awareness of ACEs or providing Trauma Informed Care is a sufficient response to childhood trauma & adversity on its own. Currently there is limited UK evidence that TIC improves outcomes for children – need better definition and evaluation.
4/
Therefore, we should consider whether ‘being trauma informed’ is sufficient as the main element of police prevention work or as a way of delivering their statutory responsibility to prevent crime.

5/
We would argue being trauma informed is not enough -on its own - to tackle childhood adversity. Tackling ACES requires a comprehensive place based approach based on a set of well-evidenced interventions.

6/
EIF’s work identified 33 interventions with robust evidence of preventing ACEs or reducing ACE-related trauma. These services are not currently widely available.

7/
The police have a vital role to play here - they can’t stop or reduce ACEs on their own, but can do an enormous amount to channel the police commitment to tackling trauma & ACEs into a shared endeavour with partners.

8/
To put in place a comprehensive approach locally which includes a suite of interventions based on the evidence of what works to improve outcomes for children.

#AdverseChildhoodExperiences #earlyintervention #4nationspPh21

9/9
You can follow @donnamolloy_.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.