1/ Claim 1: Any form of endless growth is ecologically unsustainable

Because: decoupling is limited

Implications: a sustainable socialism is a socialism without growth
2/ Claim 2: Growth requires accumulation and accumulation comes with exploitation

Because: the expansion of the market sphere puts pressure on reproductive activities

Implications: if socialism means the end of exploitation, it also means the end of endless accumulation
3/ Claim 3: Prosperity without growth is possible because use values do not grow

Because: most human needs are qualitative and abide to thresholds of sufficiency, e.g. enough food to be healthy

Implications: Maximising GDP is not an effective strategy to maximise welfare
4/ Conclusions: Degrowth and (eco)socialism are natural allies, not adversaries. Instead of wasting energy squabbling, it's time for a renewal of critical theory, one that builds on Marxism and Degrowth.

END THREAD/
You can follow @timparrique.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.