<thread
>
Why you should not believe "ex-muslims"
A white French guy made a fake account pretending to be an "ex-muslim" girl, where he invented stories about being "abused by Islam"
He admitted this was a hoax and none of the stories were true. This is a reoccurring theme".

Why you should not believe "ex-muslims"
A white French guy made a fake account pretending to be an "ex-muslim" girl, where he invented stories about being "abused by Islam"
He admitted this was a hoax and none of the stories were true. This is a reoccurring theme".
Let us grade the stories of "ex-muslims" by the standards of hadith.
If a hadith has transmitters who are liars, cannot be corroborated then it's reliability was weakened.
Source: https://brill.com/view/title/12924
If a hadith has transmitters who are liars, cannot be corroborated then it's reliability was weakened.
Source: https://brill.com/view/title/12924

"van Dongen said, Hirsi Ali was not raised in a strict Muslim family, nor is from Somalia, but is from Kenya"
Sources:
a) https://telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/netherlands/1518532/Critic-of-Islam-to-quit-Holland-after-lies-are-exposed.html
b) https://theguardian.com/world/2006/may/21/jasonburke.theobserver
c) https://bridge.georgetown.edu/research/ayaan-hirsi-alis-long-history-of-fabricating-fear-mongering/

Sources:
a) https://theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/11/84-per-cent-of-grooming-gangs-are-asians-we-dont-know-if-that-figure-is-right
b) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306396813475983
c) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306396819895727

He has also lost 2 debates against Daniel and Hijab where his anti-Islam arguments are debunked.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsdT_5k9wPhEQ_Nh9zdS9kbFJ7xL0l_Es

This is someone who is so uneducated on Islam he believes Al-Ghazali (10th century) stole from William Lane Craig (20th century)
He believes he can lie about Islam if he is unaware of evidence debunking him.
Source:

This is a liar who plagiarizers outdated 18th century orientalist theories, and tries to present them as his own new discoveries.
I've debunked many of it here where he even cites scientific papers that refutes his thesis https://twitter.com/TenMillionIQ/status/1269897107412058120

She was exposed as a liar for manipulating hadith that even non-Muslim academics corrected https://twitter.com/Farid_0v/status/1246115670443675650
Now if these people narrated a hadith, that hadith would be graded as weak (Daif) or even fabricated (Mawdu)
You wouldn't believe a weak hadith as real history, then why would you believe their stories many of which even their own colleagues expose as fiction.
You wouldn't believe a weak hadith as real history, then why would you believe their stories many of which even their own colleagues expose as fiction.