There are at least three different things going on in this draft:

(1) Reasserting ministerial control over NHS England

(2) Undoing the competition-only framework of the 2012 Lansley reforms, and legislating to make collaboration easier

(3) Structural reform!
On (2), this broadly continues last 5-6 years of English national policy initiatives, and makes explicit what had been implicit before

I'm still struggling to get my head around how accountability will work, though
If not choice-and-competition, perhaps more transparency is partly an answer: https://twitter.com/axelheitmueller/status/1357209050270887940

Who's accountable to who within govt matters, but so does the 'sunshine effect' of transparency. See: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/accountability-modern-government-recommendations (h/t my colleagues @MShepheard and @ben_guerin)
(3) is there implicitly.

The draft says the proposals "avoid a disruptive top down reorganisation"...but also propose replacing Clinical Commissioning Groups with Integrated Care Systems:

"We propose that the majority of CCG functions to be exercised by the ICS NHS Board"
Sorry for the acronym soup - but I tip my hat to anyone who can explain to me how that is not a reorganisation
These are my half-formed opinions (not @instituteforgov's!) - but strikes me that:

- Case for more ministerial control not yet made
- Still need accountability if ditching internal market
You can follow @GrahamTAtkins.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.