Read on Twitter
Having a meltdown over THE SWEDISH STUDY
This is the section constantly weaponised against trans people and it is just riddled with misreported results and misleading claims.
Despite the claim in the “crime” section, they did not find a statistically significant increased risk for violent crime! They did not find a significant increase for the group as a whole and did not have enough data to run the cohort breakdowns.
Despite the claim in “gender differences,” they did not run “comparisons of female-to-males and male-to-females.” They compared both groups to cis controls and not to each other. These are the referenced tables
The “gender difference” in crime is that “male-to-females had a significantly increased risk for crime compared to female controls but not compared to males. ... By contrast, female-to-males had higher crime rates than female controls but did not differ from male controls.”
This is literally not a difference. It is the opposite of a difference. What they are reporting as a “gender difference” is the absence of one
Reporting increased conviction rates as “male pattern criminality” is absurdly inappropriate and they do it IN THE RESULTS SECTION as though it is an objective report of results and not an interpretation, I know i am a philosopher but literally who reviewed this
They don’t control for anything except age, immigration status, and psychiatric morbidity, they found the same increase across assigned sex and gender, and they just announce it indicates “male pattern criminality”......
muttering “trans women had higher conviction rates than cis women. By contrast, trans men had higher conviction rates than cis women” to myself and getting increasingly 
