Are stocks expensive?
Shocking news: I am a bear
People came to challenge my "19th century view on market valuations"
I will try with this thread to challenge my bias
Shocking news: I am a bear
People came to challenge my "19th century view on market valuations"
I will try with this thread to challenge my bias
1/
Assumption: rates always have gone down.
Yields at 0 are not a surprise.
Therefore all my analysis will be de-trended to adjust to this parameter
Read this thread to understand more
https://twitter.com/TheMarketDog/status/1336239467447812096?s=20



Read this thread to understand more

2/
Some history
The logic behind the stock market is that investors provide capital in return for a dividend
Companies generate these dividends through positive cash flows
Some history
https://twitter.com/TheMarketDog/status/1357902743088730112?s=20
Some history


Some history

3/
What are 2 main ways to do company valuation
DCF - IMHO the most logical as it computes the future projected cash flow & includes cost of capital
Comparable company ratio (e.g. P/E, EV/EBITDA)
What are 2 main ways to do company valuation


5/
Examples of DCF (or fair value)
Tech
$AAPL: market leader
$GOOG: pure tech
Industrials
$TSLA: retail favorite
$PLUG: small cap leader
Tech is "cheaper". So the thesis that the market is high because we're investing in tech doesn't make sense.
Examples of DCF (or fair value)

$AAPL: market leader
$GOOG: pure tech

$TSLA: retail favorite
$PLUG: small cap leader

6/
Let me challenge your view on P/E
Interest rates always go down. The long-term impact of low rates is priced in the market at any time
Detrending the P/E will solve the problem of lowering bonds yields
Here is the S&P P/E & the exponential trendline since 1870
Let me challenge your view on P/E



7/
Now let's look at the variance to the exponential trendline
There are always periods of manias. Fortunately for the sounds investor, these period usually followed by periods where stocks are "cheap"
Temporary periods of high ratios are not new



8/
From time to time P/E is high due to a very big "blip" in the earnings. 2009 is a good example. Stocks were "cheap" but the price earning was high.
I look at the "Buffet indicator" (Stocks/GDP) to assess this. Also de-trended.
We can see that P/E wasn't relevant in 2009.
From time to time P/E is high due to a very big "blip" in the earnings. 2009 is a good example. Stocks were "cheap" but the price earning was high.
I look at the "Buffet indicator" (Stocks/GDP) to assess this. Also de-trended.
We can see that P/E wasn't relevant in 2009.
9/
So let's remove the "blip" of 2020 (& 2021, 2022)
To do this I will look at the Shiller Ratio - CAPE. De-trended with an exp. regression
Avg inflation-adjusted earnings from the previous 10 years
34.6% above the trend. Only in '99, stocks were more expensive




In conclusion, through history people always found reason to justify sky high valuations. But more often than these sky-high valuations are not justified.
Thank you for reading & to re-tweet if you were interest
Thank you for reading & to re-tweet if you were interest
@threadreaderapp unroll
link to the top: https://twitter.com/TheMarketDog/status/1357918284100763654?s=20