We need to reboot science with transparent review.

As you know, @Eurosurveillanc investigated themselves and found nothing wrong.

The public is given no detail on who did the review and what did they consider.

But the whistleblower community is behind us.

Look what they found

Let’s start with the leak of one of the reviewers bragging about how he was a reviewer of our retraction request on @PlanetWaves

He let his woke outrage overtake his reasoning.

This reviewer is also famous for testifying against Andrew Wakefield.

@HighWireTalk https://twitter.com/kevin_mckernan/status/1356371781444100102

Let’s have a look at the arguments he uses against Wakefield.

If you get lost on this thread, you can just pick up the Corman-Drosten retraction letter and follow along as they are nearly identical.

That’s right. He skewered Wakefield using the same arguments he denies now.

He says you should sequence your amplicons. Molecular validation.
We agree.
But he gives a hall pass to Drosten for them now.
He was under Oath before so maybe this blinded review systsem is just a political liars club.

Oh... and you should have an SOP.
No shit sherlock.

We made this exact point in our review.
But Alas...
Hey look, more scrutiny over what your PCR is actually amplifying.

This is important to underscore when you are getting paid by Pharma. Otherwise, just ShapeShift your message and schill for the next pimp.

Your probes might bind in the wrong place... cause confusion.

We said that as well but got tortured for it. It’s good to see when he was paid by Pharma he agreed with us.
Wonder what changed since he’s been under Oath?

You should have a good audit trail on your samples during validation of the assay. RNA isn’t stable.

I’m starting feel like we could be accused of plagiarism. We agree on so much.

Mismatches in primers were not acceptable for people on the bad side of the vax debate.

But now they are cool.
How much was he paid by Pharma?

Bad probe designs? Anyone ever hear of people voicing that concern lately?

Well well well..
Stephen is upset Wakefield doesn’t all 3 amplicons working.

Good enough to fry Andrew but hall pass for Drosten.

How much was he paid again?

Yes. Internal controls are important for this. Without them you can’t discern if your sample is intact.

hall pass for Drosten
Career suicide for Wakefield

Everyone clear on this game?

Those damn Pesky cycles.
Poor Wakefield. He’s fried for 35 cycles.

But Drosten is special. He gets to use 45 and not really declare what should be used.

I guess the author of the PCR Bible takes Tithes.

Depending on how much you pay him, you can escape hell.

Just so everyone is clear.
When you pay your Bustin Tithes,
His opinion won’t change if he’s on the other side of the table. Really. Seems to changed quite a bit from his Oath?

He works really hard. It took him a full 1500 hours to review a PCR protocol.
That adds up.

220,000 pounds is the going rate for a scientific prostitute.

@StephenABustin

How’s my Tone now?

So you can see with Surgisphere and now Busting Bustin, science is a shit show and it comes down to non transparent journals like @Eurosurveillanc

These folks manufacture authority from boys clubs and you should boycott them if you want any shot at rebooting science post C19.

We are considering organizing a Bitcoin bounty for additional whistleblowers to come forward with data on this topic.

May need some time to organize a transparent multi-sig approach for this so we are not accused of mismanaging it.

We welcome donations of other information.

@threadreaderapp unroll