Read on Twitter
1/5 Ms. Roys does not want me to read or reply to her Twitter feed; she blocked me months ago. As I've said before, I’m very happy not to have to read her scandalmongering twaddle, and I rarely do, even when someone sends me a link.
2/5 Others have already pointed out the shoddy features of her latest screed. It frankly doesn't warrant much of a response. Ms. Roys's unhealthy, longstanding fixation with trying to discredit JM is too obvious anyway. However—
3/5 Apparently she quoted from me in this latest eruption of her monomania, but she didn't link to full versions of the documents she cherry-picked quotes from. Perhaps it's because these include data that don't fit her narrative:
http://romans45.org/misc/JFM%20and%20stewardship.pdf
http://romans45.org/misc/roys.pdf
http://romans45.org/misc/JFM%20and%20stewardship.pdf
http://romans45.org/misc/roys.pdf
4/5 Since those documents (both more than a year old) already answered several of her main accusations, I'm not going to waste time saying more. As I told her directly, I don't consider her a legitimate journalist.
And she seems bent on proving me right.
And she seems bent on proving me right.
5/5 That's really all I have to say. Though I'm willing to answer honest questions from fair-minded people, it is my general policy not to reply (especially on Twitter) to relentless busybodies and gossipmongers who appear to have malicious intent.
