https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/02/how-djt-lost-the-white-house-chapter-3-crashing-the-white-house-december-18/

1) Latest installment by Patrick Byrne on the meetings that led to Trump losing the vote fraud fight.

2) As a historian, I need to caution everyone, while this has the right feel & sufficient level of detail, it is ONE PERSON'S ACCOUNT.

3) I can give you any number of examples, from Watergate, to combat in World War II, to presidential meetings across the centuries: there are always multiple sides to the story.

4) A complete judgement cannot be made til these sides are revealed.

5) And, no matter how much we want to believe Byrne, he does have an agenda, a bias, & a position to defend.

6) That said, what is relayed here speaks again to Trump's biggest problem as President: his inability to get the right personnel in most of the right spots.

7) The meetings described match what most of us think about Cippolone, Rudy, and Meadows.

8) Rudy appeared not only incompetent, but so forgetful (or deceitful, I'd like to go with the former) that he claimed not to have received Powell's info.

9) Two times Trump appointed Powell special counsel or on the team under Rudy, but Meadows refused to act, saying "that will take some time" or "that would be a problem."

10) Totally honest here folks: it's hard to be angry at DemoKKKrats for cheating---which is who they are & what they do---when our own side was literally filled with backstabbing chattlepuppies.

I expect the snakes to be snakes, but if you agree to SERVE the President . . .

10) contd . . . then you freakin' oughta SERVE the President & not undercut him.

11) After reading this--again, if true--I would place Mark Meadows on the list of those to be prosecuted as high as The Clap or Brennanskie.

12) He is John Dean & David Stockman rolled into one evil chudsmuggling porchsnorter.

13) Now, I DO think that had Trump sent in DHS/National Guard or any other non-FBI unit with the full support of Barrstool to do anything with ballots, the following would have happened:

14) I think before any assessment of the machines or votes could have taken place under such circumstances, Botoxic would have impeached him in Dec. & Yertle's senate would have removed him.

15) It would have happened within a week. No doubt in my mind.

16) The missing element from Powell, Byrne, Rudy, & everyone else was "How do we get this OFFICIALLY sanctioned by DOJ?" With traitor Barrstool in there, it would have been hard, but there should have at least been an effort.

17) Powell should have been placed in charge.

18) I say that fully understanding she had never, ever headed an operation this large, and that technically Rudy had seniority. But any team can only have one leader. Rudy wasn't it.

19) Trump's unwillingness to demote Rudy will be one of those historical questions that . . .

19) contd . . . remains to be answered.

20) Ultimately, without the support of DOJ/FBI, I don't think it was ever going to be possible to get control of the evidence without triggering impeachment/removal.

21) And don't give me the "impeachment/removal for what?"

22) OPTICS

23) DemoKKKrats would have impeached/removed him for any reason, but you would have gotten 17 GOP votes based on OPTICS.

24) In short, while Byrne's incredible narrative (again, for the 10th time, if true) could end up as the most amazing historical narrative of . . .

24) contd . . . theft we've ever seen in American history, it doesn't change one fundamental fact:

Trump lost the war on Dec. 14 when the state legislatures sent in the slates. Nothing that happened after that was ever going to change that reality.

25) He might have had several tactical victories, but they wouldn't have even been holding actions, because the Constitutional clock was inevitable after December 14.

26) It is 100 times harder to undo a vote than to prevent it in the first place.

27) Powell and Byrne . . .

27) contd . . . were a month too late. Even then, I'm not sure the evidence they developed could have swayed the state legislators, for it was always---ALWAYS---about them and not the courts.

28) The courts were a false hope. Even Rudy said so. "No court will admit fraud."

29) To give you an analogy: it would, today, being like a court, despite overwhelming evidence & legal reasoning, issuing a ruling that nullifies Social Security. Won't happen. Not in a million years. Even if you proved the original SS Act was 100% fraud.

30) As I kept saying at the time, Rudy's nickel & dime strategy of overturning a few absentee votes here & there was a loser. It always had to be multi-state based on the same fraud in many states.

31) That proof would hare required Powell & Byrne to be on the job 11/4.

32) Had they been there & authorized, the mountain was still Everest-sized, for even had they been leading the charge on 11/4 they had ONLY til Dec. 14 to prevent legislatures from sending in delegate slates.

33) That was the play. All along, that was the only play.

34) And if anyone, anywhere saw it (we have no evidence on 11/4 they did), no one acted in time.