Read on Twitter
In @EP_Agriculture, @COPACOGECA at his best with @masgiansanti implying that we will go back to the XIXth century with the F2F Strategy #Amish, quoting the misleading study from USDA.....
The agroecological transition is in the best interest of farmers. He is right when he quotes the dangers of synthetic food for agriculture. But by refusing and attacking the need of the transition @COPACOGECA is the best ally fo those who want the end of agriculture...
@UliMuellerMdEP stating that specialisation of agri-system is the way forward. Against more or less all the scientific litterature...
An complaining about the price payed to farmers. Yes we agree, I hope she will be as vocal as now when the Council will reject the provision of the EP in the CMO regulation...
@COPACOGECA the digitalisation is key in the sustainability of agriculture. Maybe they should assess more carefully the economical part of this digitalisation sustainability. They are more eager to falg it when we speak about agroecology...
Representant of the PDO/PGI stating that the supply regulation should be an important part of the F2F, i can only 
The EP is proposing some concret leads in the CMO regulation. Maybe @EUAgri @Consilium_fr should listen to the producers! Fair and stable income is key.
The EP is proposing some concret leads in the CMO regulation. Maybe @EUAgri @Consilium_fr should listen to the producers! Fair and stable income is key.
The scientific panel begins now with clear statements. https://twitter.com/Perrin_Cam/status/1357263218117402626?s=20
The scientific panel is clear, all 3 panelists say the same : We need a transformative change, we need a paradigm shift, on agriculture pratices but also on our economical model.
@HerbertDorfmann boldly contesting the scientist conclusion on the link between emerging diseases and intensive livestock....
Mediterranean regime + impact assessment of F2F = the winning combo of agriconservative
Well to sum it up for those who weren't able to follow the debate
Prof. Ingrid Visseren-Hamakers from @Radboud_Uni very clear : there is no dichotomy between what the farmers and the consumers needs.
Maybe only the price could be a problem but it can be tackled through public policies.
Maybe only the price could be a problem but it can be tackled through public policies.
Dr. Johan Rockström from @PIK_Climate put it straight : emergence of new diseases comes from our overexploitation of nature. @HerbertDorfmann, this is science!
"Food waste is mostly caused by the fact that price is too cheap. Cheap and unhealthy food"!
"We have to integrate the true cost of price and then compensate for the most modest household"
"We have to integrate the true cost of price and then compensate for the most modest household"
And to conclude this very erratic live thread, enough talking and as @LinsNorbert said : "Guten Appetit"
