As the coup proceeds: one of the sort of interesting, even promising, things I've seen is that we're hearing some different voices than usual - @the_ayeminthant @ThawWinnie @Aung_Kaung_Myat @yanoak e.g. - less of the old ex-diplomats, "experts," and a certain historian.
In part this is just a question of Twitter visibility – with respect to a country where Twitter is largely irrelevant, barely used. So it’s not something to over-estimate.
In any case, there might be a couple of points where I disagree (respectfully) with some of the discussions I’ve seen. First, I don’t see rationality/irrationality – namely the Tatmadaw’s – as a helpful analytical lens.
This kind of guesswork psychologizing sidesteps the more in-depth, structural analysis we need.
The point is not that the generals are actually rational, even though it might seem otherwise – the point is that rational/irrational is itself a flawed analytic, excluding far too much of the analytical work that’s necessary (imo).
I also don’t think foreign observers tend too often to see “cunning, rational” actors in Myanmar – if anything it’s surely the exoticizing attribution of irrationality that’s far more common.
Hence all the claims chalking up the military’s actions to (e.g.) “senseless personalized grievance,” as I saw it put at one point.
I’d argue, in fact, that the speculative psychologizing I’ve seen is only far too typical of many Myanmar watchers’ liberal presuppositions, advancing a palace-watching, top-down, individualizing mode of analysis to the exclusion of structural factors.
(Friends and family in Myanmar are hardly immune from this mode of analysis, of course.)
And second: have we returned to the bad old days, to the “old, isolated” past? It’s understandable enough. When I called my parents after the news broke, my dad’s voice shook with anger – they’re dragging us back in time, he said.
He talked about his memories of the coup in 1962 – tanks rolling through the streets, a climate of anger and fear – the Rangoon University Student Union building dynamited later. (He could hear the blast, he said, living nearby.) He felt it’s all happening again.
Again, it’s understandable enough – but it’s not all happening again. Military coups don’t belong to some desperate ahistorical past, in Myanmar or elsewhere (see: Thailand, e.g.). Always historicize: the conditions of the early 60s are not the conditions of the early 2020s.
What we see is not some generals stuck in the past, but a response to strikingly contemporary conditions: a disputed election (if baselessly), a military grappling with its lack of a social base, shifting dynamics around conflict and capital, even perhaps the global pandemic.
It’s essential, it seems to me, that we move away from dismissing this coup as some vestige of an irrational past. Not least because doing so affords little at best in terms of political insights moving forward. And resistance is in the air.
Forgive me: I’ll be airing my own take on recent events shortly. Meanwhile, *do* read at least these pieces – and feel free to disagree with my read. Regardless, I’m genuinely excited to see a shift away from the usual voices. Onwards.
Here are a couple more pieces that, for me (again respectfully), do a little too much to reduce the coup to a kind of palace intrigue, to personalized grievances at the top.
(Fin)
You can follow @Rgnhardliner.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.