What if you just made it “anglo-american global commercial liberalism”? Isn’t that what Communism has always been a front for anyway? I see bluecheck Bidenists more interested in defending american unipolar hegemony than in “building communism” https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1355732486903406593

It’s funny that Yarv has no idea what Land is on about at any given time (he attests to me personally)— but what Land sees in common is an occulted “defense of Malthusian Global Commercial Liberalism” presented as a “right” stance against the “leftist” defense of the same system.

But all this “leftism” was invented by the British empire! It’s just a colonial divide & conquer, weaponized to harness the rising bourgeois “new elites” to defend the Empire (global world trade federation).

You *need* the “professional Left” to harness the destructive capability of the bourgeois (the true revolutionary class) via the lumpenprole (black bloc). Use all parts of the beast— have another set instrumentalize the petty bourgeois (qanon maga shamanism)— no contradiction.

If you like Malthusian Global Liberalism, you *need* all of this totalitarian instrumentalization & psyops. The whole point of the Panopticon is that the prisoners *are kept in a state of perpetual paranoia.* It collapses if the guard tower is actually audited!

If the system had to justify itself with the magisterial inerrancy of ABSOLUTE MONARCHY— it would fail! It *has* to justify itself as “Democracy” — the SCAPEGOATING is the TENSEGRITY of the system! The Tensions must hold! Slack makes the structure fall!

The all seeing eye “appears to float in the air” because it’s kept aloft by myriad strings kept in a state of absolute tension— if the real rulers had to “touch base”— it would all fall apart!

Yarvin says Navalny is “for the West”— what “west”? Naturally— the British!

“The Right”

Ockham’s Razor here— read Quigley lol