The study is neither conclusive or particularly compelling. It reads more like an extended op-ed with its own bias. It declares allegations of bias as "false" and "disinformation" while quietly noting that it cannot conclusively say whether there is bias. https://jonathanturley.org/2021/02/03/the-nyu-study-the-claim-of-anti-conservative-bias-in-social-media-is-unfounded-but-inconclusive/

...So the study is not actually based on a review of individuals and groups censored by these companies because the companies refuse to release the data. Much of the rest of study seems strikingly conclusory and at points apologist.

...NYU calls allegations of bias against conservatives “disinformation,” the very term used as a basis for flagging or censoring material. But the study is largely conclusory and acknowledges that it is not based on any real hard data and is therefore “inconclusive.”