Leaving Musk aside, seems more like how the venture capitalists who fund Clubhouse—who are not coincidentally on the app’s Suggested User List—are guaranteed an audience by the app & thus an audience for the content they produce for their new ‘media’ arm? https://www.theverge.com/2021/2/1/22261435/elon-musk-clubhouse-podcasts-robinhood
BTW (as I’ve said to many folks who vehemently disagreed) given that Discord exists...& that there are many competitors to Clubhouse....& @TwitterSpaces is about to become a thing, CH’s best option is being acquired by Facebook. Could that be why Zuck just joined the stage?
If Facebook buys Clubhouse, it is buying an audience it lost—will folks stay? (I know I won’t but that suggests nothing)…. https://twitter.com/dearsarah/status/1357602572538814466?s=20
That said, given who Clubhouse has intentionally chosen to build an audience for (thu their Suggested User List)—and who it has not (for eg journalists, actual experts) the content would fit into who Facebook who has been catering to (by euphemizing hate as engagement) already…
When users join Clubhouse, unless they are hyper aware/very tech adept, they are forced to follow a selection of users called the Suggested User List (SUL). Tho there are about ~70 folks on the list, each user follows 52 users when they join.
If a new user adds their socials, some of these 52 accounts are folks they know—otherwise (at least until 2/2/21) each user followed 52 users out of these ~70 folks. These ~70 are the most followed folks on Clubhouse—& of the top 25 most followed users, 6 are VCs from a16z.
When anyone on the Suggested User List opens a room on CH—or speaks—it sends notifications to 100s of 1000s of people. These ~70 people—some of whom are the most divisive folks on the app, who spread misinfo & hate—have a guaranteed audience that no other user can compete with.
No matter what the topic is, the Suggested User List drives the largest audience. It would've been easy to change before, but now ow that the app is apparently 6 million plus users, it is difficult to imagine how this’d change…or who anyone else could compete?
2 nights ago, a VC (who bristles when the media identifies him as alt-right but whose boss put Josh Hawley in his office--& is now trying to rebrand libertarians as centrist), who is on the Suggested User List, had an audience of several 1000 people listening to his life story.
Meanwhile, Perez Hilton & Tori Spelling had a couple hundred people…& so did a room with Amber Rose, LaKeith Stanfield & Marlon Wayans. Until Tiffany Haddish entered & then the room suddenly filled with thousands of people. Because Tiffany is on the SUL...
Clubhouse does not drive audiences to experts—it drives users to people who work for a16z…& to the folks who work for their app…& some friends. More than half of this list are investors/venture capitalists…quite a few of whom who identify as libertarians...(but no socialists!)
Some of whom--as the founders have been told over & over) spread hate & misinfo! (& give repeated performance)

Also some folks are artists or work in entertainment.

To be clear, not all of the folks on the Suggested User List are awful! Quite a few are folks I like & respect!
But who is included on the Suggested User List was an issue before I joined in September ….& despite endless promises to address this & many other trust & safety issues the Suggested User List exacerbates (& how easy it’d have been to change), nothing has changed.
Clubhouse made the choice to build this audience for the folks on the Suggested User List by design & intention—not by accident. They have chosen a list that encourages division & (like Facebook) euphemizes hate as engagement.
But seems like “no conflict no interest no ethics” has become a way of life for various Facebook’s Board & investors & entourage … https://twitter.com/dearsarah/status/839952972964466688?s=20
Sidenote: it's shocking how indoctrinated folks are by the tech industry. The billionaire worship is wild…& scary, especially if you believe in egalitarianism....the rule of law....& democracy. If Clubhouse users don't realize that design dictates user behavior, who does?
& it boggles my mind that folks don’t realize startup valuations are self-serving nonsense. https://twitter.com/dearsarah/status/1353807919888830466?s=20 And even more so when these valuations are made by VCs who benefit from them….& are on the Suggested User List…1 is on the BOD of the best target for acquisition.
But I’ve never encountered an app that is more addictive—or more radicalizing….& I am not sure what is better at spreading hate & misinfo. https://twitter.com/dearsarah/status/1310858392584372224?s=20
Which is why I started this project…. https://twitter.com/ellenhuet/status/1354129997317849091?s=20
Unfortunately, at least so far I’ve failed to convince any journalist (or um really their editors) to write about the Suggested User List—and the impact it has on discourse, as well as who is included in it.
By design & intention, journalists don't have an audience—but libertarian VCs—who now block journos—are guaranteed an audience.

Maybe, because of Zuck & because journos are being blocked & a certain new "media" co, someone'll write about Suggested User List.(if so, i have data!)
Another excellent & important piece on the rapid spread of misinformation—by design—on Clubhouse. https://twitter.com/thediyora/status/1359447578388041739
So I guess Clubhouse turned down an acquisition offer from Facebook? https://twitter.com/MikeIsaac/status/1359564631409258497
The “Intellectual Dark Web” Is Nothing New https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-intellectual-dark-web-is-nothing-new/ Nor is their intellectual dishonesty & their ritualized performances

Weird how many are on CH's Suggested User List--it's almost like the divisiveness is intentional & is radicalizing folks by design & intention?
👏 @Steven_Ballmer, on Clubhouse, just recommended speaking to journalists & the media, because that’s where folks get trustworthy information....

Gotta wonder if he realizes how radical an idea that is in this crowd...
Clubhouse in China: Is the data safe?
https://cyber.fsi.stanford.edu/io/news/clubhouse-china No it is not. Anyone surprised?

Is it more likely this was an accident—or that the Chinese government enabled the app for a few days both to surveil its citizens & to allow their spies the necessary cover to join?!?
Well, just like the Chinese intelligence agencies, they are already listening loudly.... https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1360697159767711749
Elon Musk Asks Kremlin for a Talk on the Clubhouse App
https://flip.it/l4EPXy  /sure, this is lawless, but otoh I’m not sure there is a better way to encourage @StateDept & US intelligence services to pay attention to what is happening on the app?
Silicon Valley’s Safe Space https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/13/technology/slate-star-codex-rationalists.html This isn’t explicitly about Clubhouse (tho it is being discussed now)—but if you’re confused by the rigid libertarian ideology (& their hatred of journalism) there—especially from folks on the SuggestedUserList—please read this!
In defense of blocking on Clubhouse
https://www.platformer.news/p/in-defense-of-blocking-on-clubhouse Odd how this completely misses how this feature is (predictably) weaponized by the most powerful to bully & exclude the most vulnerable on the app? And allows 1 person to unilaterally decide--without others knowing?
I helped build ByteDance’s vast censorship machine. I wasn't proud of it & neither were my coworkers. But that's life in today's China. https://www.protocol.com/china/i-built-bytedance-censorship-machine Sidenote: clearly private companies (eg FB, CH) could choose to--rather than profiting from hate & misinfo--exclude it.
You can follow @dearsarah.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.