Read on Twitter
National Model Design Code: Some views. 1. I think i'd rather see a authority wide code than a series of them. A guide implies that it is optional (albeit language is important). Site specific codes can be developed in due course for significant sites.
2. It's ironic that @mhclg say that the NMDC is 'guidance' albeit, it should be used to guide the production of codes going forward.
3. The use of design codes has the potential to reduce the amount of text heavy policy documents that LPA's have to produce. A visual interpretation of what is intended by policy wording is a lot easier than having to describe it.
4. The idea that LPA's will defer to the National Design Guide/Code & MfS is admirable... considering many LPA's haven't read them/use them in any significant way. See the @UDGUrbanUpdate report on the use of MfS for instance.
5. Whilst i'm personally, very, excited about finally being forced to develop codes, rather than saying that they'd "be a powerful tool" only to be told we don't have the resources to produce one. They will require massive investment in to LPA's which have been cut to the bone.
6. Same goes for the levels of engagement that is expected. It cannot be left to, what will most likely be - the lone urban design officer in the LPA - to develop and carry out the level of engagement envisaged in the NMDC. This requires a whole systems approach.
7. There is an opportunity to be creative though, when it comes to engagement. Tools such as @Placestandard @Cmnplace etc. give the opportunity to give qualitative data that can be interpreted formally. Rather than "they who shout loudest"
8. Where resources are tight, consideration should be given to establishing City Region / County wide bodies which can help deliver the place/design quality agenda. Examples can be found abroad of similar practice, but also at home with @PlaceServices.
9. As noted by others @Paul_SLG etc. The obsession with street trees is welcome (unless of course you live in Sheffield...), however, this needs to be backed up with funds - LA's can't afford to look after street trees.
10. The increase in the use of data will most likely be a burden for LPA's as well. The use of GIS in some, isn't amazing and certainly not to its true ability. The ability to create 3D plans for new development, so that people can visualise it is possible now, for instance.
11. As to who can produce design codes, surely, the ultimate arbiter in this should be the LPA? Whilst developers can produce them, they should be in conjunction with the community and the LPA, with the LPA determining if it is acceptable. Does Holland allow such practices?
12. Ultimately, a big round of applause is deserved for @URBEDmcr for delivering a challenging brief. A How to Guide to Design Codes for LPA's. We now need a huge effort to get Cllr's and LA's to understand the resourcing implications going forward. /ends
