Beyond all the creepy aspects of *journalists* again taking the lead in demanding media voices be repressed, @brianstelter's claim that "freedom of speech is different than freedom of reach" is totally false and has been rejected by courts for decades. https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1355912037499613185
Imagine if you're an anti-Wall Street group and you want to march on Wall St & the city tells you: oh, you can march, but not on a busy street. We'll give you a permit to march on a deserted street in Queens.
You think that's not a free speech violation? Tons of caselaw on this
You think that's not a free speech violation? Tons of caselaw on this
Also, CNN lies and spreads conspiracy theories constantly. They're a pro-Democratic Party outlet that barely airs any dissent from the DNC line. If @brianstelter's standards for banishing Fox were applied equally, it'd affect all cable news outlets, not just one.
Hey @brianstelter, I know you don't do dissent on your show -- can't have anyone challenging you or upsetting your DNC audience -- but the next time you want to claim "freedom of speech isn't freedom of reach," read this on "free speech zones" by @ACLU: https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/student-speech-and-privacy/when-colleges-confine-free-speech-zone-it-isnt-free