Pointing out nationalism (nation state one) conceptually arose not long ago is of course a silly "dunk", of course you know this because groups are dynamic in their tribalism which has existed forever, but I don't really boil this down to material conditions or externalities.

It's no coincidence nation state nationalism and romanticism arose basically in the culmination of higher IQ populations in Western Europe following the European genetic revolution (watch the AltHyp vid on it). Smarter populations can expand their in-group and notions of it.

Even as Africa is met with external global influences where is their tangible pan-Africanism? Where is their romanticism for even nation states? There is none, because they're largely stuck in tribal notions of society. The nation is largely a foreign concept to them.

African populations iirc have more genetic diversity than European ones, because they've been isolated tribes for so long sans Bantu expansion. But what is all of this to say really? Well, that intelligent populations can expand their group to its limit (race).

I dont even think White Nationalism is an old idea per se, America and certain colonial groups represented it to an extent but even with America it had a solid Anglo base for quite long. Perhaps our conceptions of White Nationalism are new, and rather revolutionary?

To counter global shitlibbery reaffirming nation state nationalism seems anachronistic as it is an outdated form of tribalism, even if a little idealistic I think newer more global notions of White Nationalism are more suitable. After all, most of you guys talk to foreign RW ppl