My first internship was as an equity research analyst, writing about companies. We did a study: there was zero correlation between the quality of management’s presentations and their performance/effectiveness.
Doug Pederson’s press conferences were shambolic; Andy Reid’s platitudinous; Belichick’s soporific.
This is noise, not signal.
This is noise, not signal.
Having finally listened to this press conference:
This was Lurie’s worst performance I can remember. He’s generally thoughtful and articulate, but this was not his day. Rambling, platitudinous and sprinkled with non sequitors. (1/n)
This was Lurie’s worst performance I can remember. He’s generally thoughtful and articulate, but this was not his day. Rambling, platitudinous and sprinkled with non sequitors. (1/n)
2/n:
The Philly press corps is top notch, with an abundance of talented, dedicated, pugnacious reporters. But there are a few troglodytes. To call on the likes of Eskin while ignoring Kapadia and Wulf is unforgivable. BOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
The Philly press corps is top notch, with an abundance of talented, dedicated, pugnacious reporters. But there are a few troglodytes. To call on the likes of Eskin while ignoring Kapadia and Wulf is unforgivable. BOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
3/n Any pundit who claims Nick Sirianni’s introductory presser gave a signal - good or bad - about his future performance as a head coach can be safely ignored.
In summary: don’t judge a head coach by his press conferences, which are orthogonal to performance. But do judge a PR staff and organization by how they run them (e.g. allowing the CEO to deliver a soliloquy while not taking questions).
[clears throat]
Time’s yours.
[clears throat]
Time’s yours.