1. After one year of pandemic, 2M deaths, all the hard work of decades was erased in a matter of months. Smoking rates in many countries of the world have increased significantly, especially the US. (Find why⬇️)

@hollieahughes
@_chloeswarbrick
@AlexWodak https://www.wsj.com/articles/during-covid-19-lockdowns-people-went-back-to-smoking-11611829803
During Covid-19 Lockdowns, People Went Back to Smoking

The decline in cigarette sales slowed sharply last year amid health concerns about e-cigarettes.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/during-covid-19-lockdowns-people-went-back-to-smoking-11611829803
2. During that same period is estimated that 8 M deaths occurred in the world attributed to smoking related diseases. Smoking is by a 4-fold more deadly that covid19.
2. During that same period is estimated that 8 M deaths occurred in the world attributed to smoking related diseases. Smoking is by a 4-fold more deadly that covid19.
2. During that same period is estimated that 8 M deaths occurred in the world attributed to smoking related diseases. Smoking is by a 4-fold more deadly that covid19.
2. During that same period is estimated that 8 M deaths occurred in the world attributed to smoking related diseases. Smoking is by a 4-fold more deadly that covid19.
3. During lockdown people smoked more because they spent more time at home and had more money to spend on cigarettes because they spent less on other things like gas, entertainment.
3. During lockdown people smoked more because they spent more time at home and had more money to spend on cigarettes because they spent less on other things like gas, entertainment.
3. During lockdown people smoked more because they spent more time at home and had more money to spend on cigarettes because they spent less on other things like gas, entertainment.
4. At the same time, some e-cigarette users turned back to combustible cigarettes because of increased e-cig taxes, bans on flavored vaping products and confusions about the health effects of vaping.
4. At the same time, some e-cigarette users turned back to combustible cigarettes because of increased e-cig taxes, bans on flavored vaping products and confusions about the health effects of vaping.
4. At the same time, some e-cigarette users turned back to combustible cigarettes because of increased e-cig taxes, bans on flavored vaping products and confusions about the health effects of vaping.
4. At the same time, some e-cigarette users turned back to combustible cigarettes because of increased e-cig taxes, bans on flavored vaping products and confusions about the health effects of vaping.
5. The @WHO, Scientist like @ProfGlantz, and medical associations sponsored by Bloomberg (Asthma, cancer and lung foundations around the world +others) are the main contributors to these campaigns of misinformation.
5. The @WHO, Scientist like @ProfGlantz, and medical associations sponsored by Bloomberg (Asthma, cancer and lung foundations around the world +others) are the main contributors to these campaigns of misinformation.
5. The @WHO, Scientist like @ProfGlantz, and medical associations sponsored by Bloomberg (Asthma, cancer and lung foundations around the world +others) are the main contributors to these campaigns of misinformation.
5. The @WHO, Scientist like @ProfGlantz, and medical associations sponsored by Bloomberg (Asthma, cancer and lung foundations around the world +others) are the main contributors to these campaigns of misinformation.
5. The @WHO, Scientist like @ProfGlantz, and medical associations sponsored by Bloomberg (Asthma, cancer and lung foundations around the world +others) are the main contributors to these campaigns of misinformation.
6. Bloomberg who sponsors handsomely the @WHO, and anti-vaping campaigns disagrees with vaping, because vaping is hindering pharmaceutical profits as a non-pharmaceutical tool more effective, similarly harmful, cheaper than pharma nicotine and pharma nicotine gum.
6. Bloomberg who sponsors handsomely the @WHO, and anti-vaping campaigns disagrees with vaping, because vaping is hindering pharmaceutical profits as a non-pharmaceutical tool more effective, similarly harmful, cheaper than pharma nicotine and pharma nicotine gum.
6. Bloomberg who sponsors handsomely the @WHO, and anti-vaping campaigns disagrees with vaping, because vaping is hindering pharmaceutical profits as a non-pharmaceutical tool more effective, similarly harmful, cheaper than pharma nicotine and pharma nicotine gum.
6. Bloomberg who sponsors handsomely the @WHO, and anti-vaping campaigns disagrees with vaping, because vaping is hindering pharmaceutical profits as a non-pharmaceutical tool more effective, similarly harmful, cheaper than pharma nicotine and pharma nicotine gum.
6. Bloomberg who sponsors handsomely the @WHO, and anti-vaping campaigns disagrees with vaping, because vaping is hindering pharmaceutical profits as a non-pharmaceutical tool more effective, similarly harmful, cheaper than pharma nicotine and pharma nicotine gum.
7. Bloomberg and his shares with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies, also don't like the disruptive concept of a product that can easily remove 30% of the cancers in the world mid-long term so rapidly. Because markets need estability and probably cancer is a good business.
7. Bloomberg and his shares with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies, also don't like the disruptive concept of a product that can easily remove 30% of the cancers in the world mid-long term so rapidly. Because markets need estability and probably cancer is a good business.
7. Bloomberg and his shares with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies, also don't like the disruptive concept of a product that can easily remove 30% of the cancers in the world mid-long term so rapidly. Because markets need estability and probably cancer is a good business.
7. Bloomberg and his shares with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies, also don't like the disruptive concept of a product that can easily remove 30% of the cancers in the world mid-long term so rapidly. Because markets need estability and probably cancer is a good business.
7. Bloomberg and his shares with Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies, also don't like the disruptive concept of a product that can easily remove 30% of the cancers in the world mid-long term so rapidly. Because markets need estability and probably cancer is a good business.
8. 30% of the profits of several pharma companies come from cancer treatments, and after billions invested in R&D, they need to make sure there is a market for them

And yes, nicotine DOES not cause cancer, and the Pharmaceutical companies, WHO and Bloomberg know this well.
8. 30% of the profits of several pharma companies come from cancer treatments, and after billions invested in R&D, they need to make sure there is a market for themAnd yes, nicotine DOES not cause cancer, and the Pharmaceutical companies, WHO and Bloomberg know this well.
8. 30% of the profits of several pharma companies come from cancer treatments, and after billions invested in R&D, they need to make sure there is a market for themAnd yes, nicotine DOES not cause cancer, and the Pharmaceutical companies, WHO and Bloomberg know this well.
@GrimmGreen
@Vapingit @phil_w888 @KnowNicotine @Hello_Alex @ChaunceyGardner
You can follow @ElianaRubashkyn.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.