This was to be a response to a deleted tweet (author's moniker rhymes with choke hate fear scold):

A KMac reader in crypsis (hiding power level, so to speak) may also speak about the matter with more nuance and delicacy than a newborn fawn like Lindsay.

Exhibit A:

"Anti-Semitism is on the rise again[ and while there is LW] anti-Semitism[, RW] anti-Semitism is flared up because of conditions and identity politics[, and far RW] anti-Semitism is arising because lots of [Woke] progressive Jews."

We can quibble with the details (LWers are "anti-Semitic" almost entirely by accident,e.g. by extension of criticizing CEOs and Likudniks).

More-or-less, however, it's pretty much correct. It's also a reputation-tarnishing way of presenting such an attempt at objective analysis.

Exhibit B:

"Often wrongly, and often with horrifying results, the souring of ingroup-outgroup relations occurs due to real and/or perceived disparities (ideological, religious, pecuniary, status,etc.) between the ingroup and outgroup. Jews are no exception; they prove the rule."

Very different. Also very underhanded. It softens the blow for what is to come next, for both the reader and the author (who is now in a conciliatory mode of thought, rather than one concerned with offensive bluntness).