Brilliant and necessary piece. https://twitter.com/jenzerb/status/1354447338299944961
A seemingly small detail here might actually be the whole enchilada.
Manly men at magazines are very possessive over display copy — headlines, pullquotes, coverlines and clickbait.
Manly men at magazines are very possessive over display copy — headlines, pullquotes, coverlines and clickbait.
This is essentially ad copy and, as @jenzerb makes clear, it can be used to cut against and reframe articles entirely.
This is partly why so many writers left out of the boys-club hard-drinking Sterling Cooper part of media find their pieces misinterpreted.
Because the bros are writing the headlines — and that’s all anyone reads.
Because the bros are writing the headlines — and that’s all anyone reads.
This is way less true at daily newspapers — for print, anyway.
But when I was at magazines the guys all wanted to be @JonahPeretti & try their hand at $$$ SEO. So the online headlines were often by bros.
But when I was at magazines the guys all wanted to be @JonahPeretti & try their hand at $$$ SEO. So the online headlines were often by bros.
The fix is simple, just try it out:
Give display copy to nonwhite people or nonmen people or both.
Give display copy to nonwhite people or nonmen people or both.
Create transparency around display copy to cut down on misleading headlines.