Yesterday, Berkeley abolished parking minimums, instituted parking maximums, and required new development to provide more bus passes and bike parking (among other things). It is a thrilling day for climate action and affordability in our city.
In 2015, I authored legislation to explore parking reform to address affordability and climate goals. (I swear I'm not as scary as this picture makes me look). https://www.berkeleyside.com/2015/10/28/green-housing-package-sails-through-berkeley-council
So, what do progressive parking reforms like this mean?
--We reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help save the environment.
--We reduce rent.
--We encourage alternative forms of mobility
--We help create more affordable homes for people.
--We reduce greenhouse gas emissions and help save the environment.
--We reduce rent.
--We encourage alternative forms of mobility
--We help create more affordable homes for people.
Here are some corrections to misunderstandings:
--We have not banned parking. We are just not forcing people to build it if they donât want it.
--It does not apply retroactively. The parking police arenât going to snatch your spots.
--We have not banned parking. We are just not forcing people to build it if they donât want it.
--It does not apply retroactively. The parking police arenât going to snatch your spots.
--It does not affect evacuation egress. Street management is the only way to help evacuation egress.
--It helps seniors and disabled individuals. Accessibility is central to this policy and allows for more mobility options.
--It helps seniors and disabled individuals. Accessibility is central to this policy and allows for more mobility options.
When I introduced this policy in 2015, it was a new idea to many and one that made some nervous but the link between parking requirements and rents has been well-documented.
ONE parking spot in the Bay Area costs AT LEAST $40,000 to construct and those costs are passed on to renters. Not only that, our studies showed that almost HALF of our parking spaces sit empty.
So, do we want to prioritize homes for people or homes for cars?
So, do we want to prioritize homes for people or homes for cars?
But antiquated parking requirements are also an environmental issue. The evidence is clear-- mandating parking, even when one doesnât want it, is bad environmental policy. Currently, 60% of Berkeleyâs greenhouse gas emissions are from transportation.
That's why the elimination of parking minimums has broad support from climate scientists and environmental organizations like @TransForm_Alert @gbeltalliance @SFBaySierraClub & @DonaldShoup. Also, @DonaldShoup and @JeffSpeckFAICP supported my legislation way back in 2015!
I want to specifically commend our terrific planning commissioners, staff, and the steadfast and consistent leadership of @JesseArreguin and our new(ish) councilmember @RigelRobinson on this issue.
When I talked with a few planning commissioners over the past month, they said this was the most monumental and impactful legislation they had been a part of.
I agree.
This is a big deal. So, thank you everyone for your support. It matters. Local politics can change our world
I agree.
This is a big deal. So, thank you everyone for your support. It matters. Local politics can change our world