A letter drafted and signed by many of his colleagues at MIT, which is worth reading in full, highlights their concerns on the case, including the degree to which the charges involve what are typically "considered normal academic and research activities." https://twitter.com/zhigangsuo/status/1352584589445902336?s=20
These latest charges occur through the @TheJusticeDept China Initiative, which has sought to counter economic espionage. While this effort tackles very real, serious threats, its framing and messaging have provoked serious concerns about undue profiling. https://www.justice.gov/opa/information-about-department-justice-s-china-initiative-and-compilation-china-related
As @MargaretKLewis has warned in her excellent research on the topic, "The Department of Justice is not making up a threat. It is, however, framing that threat in a problematic way." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3600580
I'd also raised the idea of an independent assessment of the track record of U.S. law enforcement on cases involving allegations of tech transfer in previous testimony to @USCC_GOV, which I'd argue again is more urgent in light of the current concerns. https://www.cnas.org/publications/congressional-testimony/chinese-military-innovation-in-artificial-intelligence
On Jan. 5, @AAAJ_AAJC sent a letter calling upon Biden administration to end the China Initiative and take measures across government to combat bias against Asian American and Asian immigrant scientists. These recommendations merit attention—and action. https://advancingjustice-aajc.org/sites/default/files/2021-01/Letter%20to%20President-elect%20Biden%20Re%20the%20China%20Initiative.pdf
You can follow @EBKania.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.