Hidden behind the facade of freedom and transparency are unfair advantages to private players, a lack of legal recourse for farmers, complete legal immunity for “anyone acting in good faith” and an ill-conceived attempt at deregulation without a fallback option. 2/n
Farmers want the government to repeal these three laws. They are not only worried about how these rules will play out in reality; they are also claiming that the government is rigging the market and playing into the hands of large corporate houses. 3/n
The farm laws repose unquestioning faith in private companies and argue that the inflow of private capital will augment farmers’ incomes. History has shown us that it never really happens. 4/n
“Our biggest fear is that we will not get our money,” says Sandeep Singhroha from Karnal in Haryana. “At least in the mandi, we are assured of getting paid on the spot. Who will be responsible if we don’t get paid outside?” 5/n
His fears are not unfounded. From Madhya Pradesh, which implemented similar rules last year: 6/n
From Bihar, which abolished the mandis in 2006: 7/n
Two of the three bills--about creating independent private markets and on contract farming--give overriding legal immunity to anyone acting in good faith. All disputes are to be settled by the SDM and then an appellate authority. Farmers have no legal remedies. 8/n
There are many problems with the language of the laws but the way they were implemented--without consultation with agricultural leaders and without following a democratic process in Parliament--is probably the biggest problem yet. Here's what one farmer told me: 9/n
You can follow @sahaprd.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.