Manchester City Attack (THREAD)
Most FPL managers are looking to replace Kevin De Bruyne, and many find their replacement in his team, Manchester City. But if we dig deeper into it, which Man City midfielder is the best one to own?
#FPL #FPLCommunity
Most FPL managers are looking to replace Kevin De Bruyne, and many find their replacement in his team, Manchester City. But if we dig deeper into it, which Man City midfielder is the best one to own?
#FPL #FPLCommunity
In this thread I’m going to compare 5 City midfielders that could be options to replace KDB. Bernardo Silva, Ilkay Gündogan, Raheem Sterling, Phil Foden and Riyad Mahrez. I compare their rotation risk, goal threat and assist potential to conclude who is the best asset to own.
PL Starts last 5 games:
Silva: 5/5
Gündogan: 5/5
Sterling: 4/5
Foden: 3/5
Mahrez: 1/5
For the full #PepRouletteMatrix give @Legomane_FPL a follow!
Silva: 5/5
Gündogan: 5/5
Sterling: 4/5
Foden: 3/5
Mahrez: 1/5
For the full #PepRouletteMatrix give @Legomane_FPL a follow!
Conclusion:
Both Gündogan and SIlva have started 5 games in a row and we can, with KDB out, consider them pretty nailed. Sterling has 4 starts out of 5 and with KDB out he’s so important for the team that he should be a starter for the upcoming games. →
Both Gündogan and SIlva have started 5 games in a row and we can, with KDB out, consider them pretty nailed. Sterling has 4 starts out of 5 and with KDB out he’s so important for the team that he should be a starter for the upcoming games. →
Foden and Mahrez are bigger rotation risks, but I still think that Foden can deliver in the next games. However, I wouldn’t go close to Mahrez as he is a way too big risk, starting only 1 of the last 5 PL games.
#FPL #FPLCommunity
#FPL #FPLCommunity
Goal Threat 2020/21:
xG/90:
1.Mahrez (0.37)
2.Foden and Sterling (0.35)
3.Gündogan (0.33)
4.Silva (0.21)
Sh/90: (Shots per 90 minutes)
1.Mahrez and Foden (2.73)
2.Gündogan (2.37)
3.Sterling (2.26)
4.Silva (1.12)
Stats source: http://understat.com
xG/90:
1.Mahrez (0.37)
2.Foden and Sterling (0.35)
3.Gündogan (0.33)
4.Silva (0.21)
Sh/90: (Shots per 90 minutes)
1.Mahrez and Foden (2.73)
2.Gündogan (2.37)
3.Sterling (2.26)
4.Silva (1.12)
Stats source: http://understat.com
Conclusion:
The numbers are generally very close to each other, but we can tell that Mahrez and Foden are the ones that possesses the biggest goal scoring threat and that Silva is pretty far from the others in both stats. →
The numbers are generally very close to each other, but we can tell that Mahrez and Foden are the ones that possesses the biggest goal scoring threat and that Silva is pretty far from the others in both stats. →
—> Still, the stats of both Gündogan and Sterling are good and should by no means exclude them as good options, it should rather be seen as reasons to pick these players who have recently proven that they can score.
Assist potential 2020/21:
xA/90:
1.Mahrez (0.33)
2.Foden and Sterling (0.23)
3.Silva (0.17)
4.Gündogan (0.12)
KP/90: (Passes that leads to a shot per 90 minutes):
1.Mahrez (2.94)
2.Foden (2.05)
3.Gündogan (1.64)
4.Sterling (1.33)
5.Silva (0.92)
xA/90:
1.Mahrez (0.33)
2.Foden and Sterling (0.23)
3.Silva (0.17)
4.Gündogan (0.12)
KP/90: (Passes that leads to a shot per 90 minutes):
1.Mahrez (2.94)
2.Foden (2.05)
3.Gündogan (1.64)
4.Sterling (1.33)
5.Silva (0.92)
Conclusion:
Again Mahrez has the best numbers, and his assist potential is way higher than the others. Both Foden and Sterling provide good numbers too, while Gündogans and especially Silvas stats are not as good as the aforementioned three players.
Again Mahrez has the best numbers, and his assist potential is way higher than the others. Both Foden and Sterling provide good numbers too, while Gündogans and especially Silvas stats are not as good as the aforementioned three players.
Bernardo Silva (£7.4)
Ownership: 0.9%
Pros:
⁃Low rotation risk![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Not expensive![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃A differential![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Low goal threat![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
⁃Not very high assist potential
Ownership: 0.9%
Pros:
⁃Low rotation risk
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Not expensive
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃A differential
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Low goal threat
![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
⁃Not very high assist potential
![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
Ilkay Gündogan (£5.5)
Ownership: 6.9%
Pros:
⁃Nailed![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Good form![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Cheap![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Low ownership![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Goal threat![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Not very high assist potential
Ownership: 6.9%
Pros:
⁃Nailed
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Good form
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Cheap
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Low ownership
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Goal threat
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Not very high assist potential
![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
Raheem Sterling (£11.5)
Ownership: 7.5%
Pros:
⁃Low rotation risk![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Goal threat![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Assist potential![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Low ownership![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Very expensive
Ownership: 7.5%
Pros:
⁃Low rotation risk
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Goal threat
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Assist potential
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Low ownership
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Very expensive
![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
Phil Foden (£6.3)
Ownership: 11.4%
Pros:
⁃Goal threat![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃High assist potential![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Cheap![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Rotation risk
Ownership: 11.4%
Pros:
⁃Goal threat
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃High assist potential
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃Cheap
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Rotation risk
![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
Riyad Mahrez (£8.1)
Ownership: 3.3%
Pros:
⁃Goal threat![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃High assist potential![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃A differential![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Huge rotation risk![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
⁃Expensive
Ownership: 3.3%
Pros:
⁃Goal threat
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃High assist potential
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
⁃A differential
![Fettes weißes Häkchen ✅](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/2705.png)
Cons:
⁃Huge rotation risk
![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
⁃Expensive
![Kreuzzeichen ❌](https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/72x72/274c.png)
Conclusion
His price makes Gündogan the best option here followed by Foden who also gives value for money. Sterling is a potential captain and has good stats which gives him third place. I wouldn’t pick Silva or Mahrez, weak stats for Silva and Mahrez is a too big rotation risk.
His price makes Gündogan the best option here followed by Foden who also gives value for money. Sterling is a potential captain and has good stats which gives him third place. I wouldn’t pick Silva or Mahrez, weak stats for Silva and Mahrez is a too big rotation risk.
Thanks for reading this thread, please share it if you found it interesting!
#FPL @FPLNima @FPL_Swe @FPLTIPZ @tricks_fpl @FPLCrateDigger @CorfFpl @FPLtransferz @allaboutfpl @FPLALLEGIANCE @fpl_buddy @Jacob61475129 @fpl_addictive @theffclub @FPLnumbers @FplStrategy @Fpl_Elite
#FPL @FPLNima @FPL_Swe @FPLTIPZ @tricks_fpl @FPLCrateDigger @CorfFpl @FPLtransferz @allaboutfpl @FPLALLEGIANCE @fpl_buddy @Jacob61475129 @fpl_addictive @theffclub @FPLnumbers @FplStrategy @Fpl_Elite