Lately, this has become fashion amongst hindus that whatever portion of the scriptures doesn't stands consistent with either their logic or science it is to be declared as interpolation.
2.. ..But this theory of interpolation doesn't hold good because logic that too human is liable to error, so you cant judge scriptures which are of divine origin on the basis of material logic which also varies from person to person!
3..Second, science cannot be the basis either because it keeps changing!
Basically the proponents of this theory normally resort to the idea that either britishers or mughals interpolated our scriptures,
Basically the proponents of this theory normally resort to the idea that either britishers or mughals interpolated our scriptures,
4. but what they don't understand is that by saying this they are undermining our thousand yrs old tradition of guru shishya parampara, which is faultless to this day and has given everything to preserve the scriptures in their purest form as far as they could,
due to which the scriptures have come down from the time of yore to the modern times .Also if you call everything that doesn't go well witn your understanding as interpolation then it is a sign of inferiority complex and lack of faith in the words of the rishis of yore and the.
scriptures. So all in all our prime scriptures are absolutely free from interpolations cuz we have all those shlokas which are are classified as interpolation present in oldest manuscripts plus commentary is also available on them thus clearly this interpolation thing is futile