The military justice system in India: a cartoon thread (for @article14live)

The Indian army has created a new human rights cell led by a Major-General for “greater transparency and probity”.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/army-creates-a-new-major-general-led-human-rights-cell/articleshow/80061714.cms
But first, a patriotic precaution.
Indian armed forces are accused at times of violating human rights. In December, the Jammu & Kashmir police charged an Army officer with murdering three men in a fake encounter in Shopian last year.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/shopian-fake-encounter-army-captain-among-3-named-in-charge-sheet/story-tSEYmSElUg4Pu2lZ4QnmYP.html
In 2019, the Army Chief even said the cell was being upgraded to a ‘directorate’.

https://indianexpress.com/article/india/army-chief-bipin-rawat-citizenship-act-protests-human-rights-6187727/
Has the cell/directorate been effective? Hard to say. Its website hasn’t been updated in nearly ten years.

https://www.indianarmy.nic.in/Site/FormTemplete/frmTempSimple.aspx?MnId=YOLFB1ZTe6mQRdOgh8kJ8Q==&ParentID=jH+NP8umFD3v8uePCQE9Ew==&flag=iNXnx5mxHn6q96cq6dB77g==
On what basis were the allegations dismissed? Again, hard to say, because the Army usually doesn’t reveal case information.

https://www.humanrightsinitiative.org/in-the-news/kashmir-encounter-releasing-court-martial-details-will-cause-public-outrage-says-army
What if security forces decide that an allegation is not unfounded? That’s where the military justice system kicks in.
A military court isn’t a permanent body like a regular court. It involves a trial by a temporary jury of soldiers convened by a senior officer.
And then there’s the JAG.
So does the court-martial system meet the basic requirements for a fair trial?

https://scroll.in/article/737413/indias-court-martial-system-fails-on-all-counts-competence-independence-impartiality
In some cases, military courts have convicted soldiers, only for the judgements to be undone by an appeals tribunal on flimsy grounds.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/terrorists-wear-pathan-suits-says-tribunal-to-justify-bail-for-convicted-machil-soldiers/story-O5iVHPWPwCLpjUC1qGOxwK.html
An aside: the Indian military justice system for the Army and other forces is based on the British Indian Army Act of 1911. But the UK itself reformed its system after it was ruled to be unfair.

http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-58016&filename=001-58016.pdf
But Indian armed forces still use this flawed system to avoid trials in civilian courts, as they did for the infamous Pathribal fake encounter.

https://www.newsclick.in/pathribal-timeline-18-years-injustice
The main tool that security forces use to block civilian trials is the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, or AFSPA. This says that even when police find evidence against soldiers, they cannot prosecute them without permission from Delhi.
Whatever the party in power, the central government virtually never grants sanction, or permission, under the AFSPA to conduct civilian trials.

http://pqars.nic.in/annex/244/Au1463.docx
International human rights standards say that military courts should not be used in cases of human rights violations.

https://undocs.org/A/68/285 
And Indian defence experts admit that our military justice system needs major reform.

https://www.mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/Reportc051020.pdf
No matter how just and honest individual Indian soldiers may be, our military justice system is too faulty to be fair. (ends)
You can follow @penpencildraw.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.