Two mannequins +/- different kinds of masks were attached to a nebulizer and a ventilator to simulate speaker and receiver, respectively. Annotated expt schema shown below. Infectious virus & viral RNA were collected and measured in the ‘receiver’ as shown . . . /2
/2 gif
A photo of the actual experimental set-up :-) Different kinds of masks (or not) were used (Cotton, surgical, N95, N95 fitted). . . ./3
I regenerated on figure (Fig. 2D) for easy comprehension. Compared to no masks scenario(w/o masks in graph), Cotton and Surgical masks worn by the receiver reduces infectious virus ‘received’ by ~20-40% whereas N95/N95 fitted masks reduces the same by ~60-80% . . ./4
If the Spreader ALONE wears a cotton mask, it reduces infectious virus received by 55%! When both Spreader and Receiver wear masks, infectious virus received is reduced by up to 90% . . . /5
Notably, even a fitted N95 mask is not perfect (20 min exp time). But I'll take 75-90% reduction in infectious virus received over nothing anyday. Combined with social distancing, strict QT policies & increasing immunity due to vaccination, we can all #StampOutCOVID19. . . /6 FIN
You can follow @VirusWhisperer.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.