Read on Twitter
I just want to point this one out very clearly:
Women's Human Rights Campaign want the full legal abolition of "transgenderism", including any legal support for it.
This has been asserted widely about their Women's Declaration, but it's extremely clear.
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/17510/pdf/
Women's Human Rights Campaign want the full legal abolition of "transgenderism", including any legal support for it.
This has been asserted widely about their Women's Declaration, but it's extremely clear.
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/17510/pdf/
Anyone who is a signatory to the Women's Declaration of Sex Based Rights, supports a group that wants the elimination of trans people, from legal recognition, but also generally as a necessity of bringing about the goals of "feminist" organising.
They also say that trans people should not be able to access medical transition support.
This is who @Keir_Starmer is pandering to when he plays to "controversy on both sides" and won't stand up to Labour Women's Declaration.
This is who we're being asked to have engage in serious debate with. People who want our elimination, legally socially, medically, and probably in other ways they've yet to say out loud.
Citation re Labour Women's Dec and their connections to the wider Women's Dec group https://archive.is/mgdPt
For the benefit of trans men and transmasculine people responding to this disappointed that you weren't scheduled for elimination by the TERFs, don't worry, you get forcibly detransitioned and treated as a mental patient.
AKA: "Here's that representation you were looking for"
My apologies for not putting that in the original thread.
My apologies for not putting that in the original thread.
(Also to be fair to myself, I had assumed that the "Elimination of transgenderism" ought to pose some worries for you guys as well, but apparently my trans brothers think "transgenderism" is just trans women.)
