Vitamin D and COVID-19: evidence and recommendations for supplementation | Royal Society Open Science

Yet another remarkable intervention in an RCT:
“The primary endpoint was admission to intensive care which was required in only 1/50 patients... https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201912
... receiving vitamin D versus 13/26 who did not receive vitamin D. This difference was highly significant even after adjustment for hypertension and diabetes (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.003–0.25)”.
Why is it we so rarely hear of successful interventions on main media or at press conferences, ostensibly to assist public health?
No mention of Vit D, of chloroquine (cheap generic for malaria) or ivermectin (cheap generic for parasitic infestation)?
It’s almost as if SAGE...
...is not really interested in public health after all. OTOH, perhaps not so surprising. SAGE isn’t a public health body & is horribly under qualified to be so. What they’re expert at, I can’t tell. Not our best interests, that’s for sure.
You can follow @MichaelYeadon3.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.