Why the outrage over a Peloton and a Rolex?
This has been a question I've been thinking about and it brings me back to a discussion I had during a class. The professor stated that Peloton had been an innovation.
I disagreed, asking how a glorified exercise bike and a iPad was innovating.
I disagreed, asking how a glorified exercise bike and a iPad was innovating.
This statement was much more controversial than I expected and immediately drew backlash from the other students. Judging by the number of $1000 coats; maybe 5 of the 20 students were not very wealthy. Comfortable; but not "rich."
The less intellectual argument was that I was out-of-touch because I could not afford one. If I were wealthy enough to own one, I would appreciate it for what it was.
The more nuanced argument that emerged was that it allowed for the gym experience, at home.
The more nuanced argument that emerged was that it allowed for the gym experience, at home.
After a back-and-forth, wherein I still didn't "get" the appeal of a Peloton; one particularly insufferable student said what the others had danced around: [I] didn't "get it" because it was never meant for people like [me] to "get;" and the Professor agreed.
Owning one signifies a certain level of wealth. The innovation, such as it is; is that it allows people with that wealth to work out with one another remotely. It is a gated-community for exercise.
That's what the faux-outrage is about.
That's what the faux-outrage is about.
That's what the outrage of President Biden owning a Rolex is about as well (never mind that Presidents are gifted the watches by the manufacturers).
It punctures the notion of the virtual caste that the ultra-wealthy have isolated themselves in.
It punctures the notion of the virtual caste that the ultra-wealthy have isolated themselves in.
To them, he cannot call himself "working-class Joe from Scranton," because that exists outside of and debases the walled-garden.
Working-class people are simply not meant to possess these things.
Working-class people are simply not meant to possess these things.
In the class, my $10 Nalgene bottle signaled who I was. My $125 (On Sale!) N2B Snorkel Parka signaled who I was. My 3-for-$20 t-shirts were what I was meant to possess.
I didn't "get" why they would spend hundreds on one shirt; because I wasn't meant to "get it."
I didn't "get" why they would spend hundreds on one shirt; because I wasn't meant to "get it."
If President Biden is a "working class" guy; he isn't meant to possess the trappings of wealth in the eyes of the extremely wealthy. Those are luxuries meant for a few; not for a person of his proclaimed caste.
Post-Script: These were the adult children of multi-millionaires, who themselves never worked a day in their life, arguing with a guy that retired comfortably at 38 and will not want for the rest of his.