Expect the pattern to repeat
In the desperate search for relevance post Trump the populism enablers will trawl Pres Biden’s comments for gotcha soundbites. Ignoring context & know-how
It’s a doubt-merchant top strategy. Compromising sounding sound bite that is then amplified https://twitter.com/ori0n7/status/1352929325926985728
In the desperate search for relevance post Trump the populism enablers will trawl Pres Biden’s comments for gotcha soundbites. Ignoring context & know-how
It’s a doubt-merchant top strategy. Compromising sounding sound bite that is then amplified https://twitter.com/ori0n7/status/1352929325926985728
Here’s speech from which the sound bite is extracted. Full speech is about 16:10 in length & its focus is the economic recovery plan. This sound bite precedes Pres Biden’s relief re. evictions. Critics focus isn’t the content of the plan but the gotcha
In his speech from the prior day he lays out the extensive COVID-19 plan.
Listen at 13:32 mark “honest truth, we’re in the midst of a dark winter, it’s going to get worse before it gets better, it’s going to take many months...”
Listen at 13:32 mark “honest truth, we’re in the midst of a dark winter, it’s going to get worse before it gets better, it’s going to take many months...”
Pandemics are complex systems that are not resolved in a day. The key issue is leverage. What actions can be taken today that moderate long-term negative impacts.
But that context is ignored. The same sound bite is repeated until the sound bite by weight of repeating = truth
But that context is ignored. The same sound bite is repeated until the sound bite by weight of repeating = truth
And perhaps this is the greatest threat to democracy & policy driven by science the world over.
Not Trump. Not populism.
But the weaponisation of sound bites? How we process information in coming to decisions. Populism feeds off the immediate, not the considered.
Not Trump. Not populism.
But the weaponisation of sound bites? How we process information in coming to decisions. Populism feeds off the immediate, not the considered.
So dear @ori0n7 nope it’s not a good thread. Unless of course the intent is misinformation (which you’re enabling). Then yes it’s a fine example of how to twist comments for own gain.