When judging the invisibles do I acknowledge Ruud Van Nistelrooy could’ve killed that early in the season with a last second penalty, or is legacy more important than undermining petty context? https://twitter.com/xthfcmatt/status/1352563789430980610

Is this picture actually iconic or does the reality of context kill that. I feel like the phrase

“a picture speaks a thousand words”

Just means a picture tells a great work of fiction which should probably be separated from the actual telling of history

This is what I will give credit to Registability and Mediocentro for. They may lacked the ultra contextual analysis of the stats community, but they had a great appreciation for narrative and the legacy of moments and players