Why was the all persuasive influence of their definition of CRT, substantiated via anecdote, believed without a quantitative study of its influence on churches? Was why our testimony about systemic racism that has quantitative data to support it treated as a mere possibility?

If it was a matter of disagreeing with the quantitative data, why believe the personal perception of the influence of their definition of CRT, but not the personal perception of the influence of racism on the lived experiences of people of Color?

Where is the peer reviewed or any study that proves Black Christian's opposition to systemic injustice and racism arises from their definition of CRT and NOT the Scriptures?

Where's the study of CRT that engages the history of Black Christian opposition to racism and systemic injustice that precedes (and influences) the formation of CRT in legal circles the aftermath of the Civil Rights Movement and then looks at points of convergence and difference?

Here is an example of an actual study that I have in mind. That actually involves evidence.... https://engineering.stanford.edu/magazine/article/black-drivers-are-less-likely-be-stopped-police-after-sunset

and this: https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/minorities-who-whiten-job-resumes-get-more-interviews