Roe v. Wade — decided 48 years ago today — was the first major Supreme Court case to address abortion rights.

📝 It protected the right to abortion, prohibiting excessive government restrictions.

What have abortion rights looked like since then? ⬇️ @shefalil explains.
*️⃣ It's important to note that there is no federal law protecting abortion rights.

Roe v. Wade is a court precedent from the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution, which is why it's so precarious. If the #SCOTUS ever reversed the ruling, there is no law to back it up.
#SCOTUS has since scaled back abortion protections, notably with 1992's Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In this case, the court upheld abortion rights, but allowed restrictions that aren't an "undue burden."

And it's why abortion rights now vary based on where you live.
— In 2020, 26 states passed new abortion restrictions, according to @Guttmacher.
— Currently, 18 states ban abortions after 20 wks.
— Four do so after 24 wks
— 20 states ban after fetal viability, the point at which the fetus can survive outside the womb https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws
Judges interpret "undue burden" differently, leaving room for anti-abortion states to pass more restrictions.

Some state laws, like six-week bans, clearly violate Roe v. Wade. Abortion opponents hope #SCOTUS will rule on such laws, and reverse or scale back Roe v. Wade.
President Joe Biden has vowed to protect abortion rights, including passing a federal law to enshrine Roe v. Wade's protections.

Though Democrats control Congress, it's unclear if he has the votes. https://bit.ly/3iydPnc 
Advocates expect state abortion restrictions to dominate 2021. Bills have been introduced in Texas, Kentucky, Montana and Ohio.

"Abortion access is actually still hanging on by a thread, and we don't foresee that changing," said @PPFA's Bonyen Lee-Gilmore. https://bit.ly/3iydPnc 
Data suggests that abortion restrictions disproportionately affect Black, Latinx and lower-income people.

Here's data the @DallasNews analyzed from a 2013 abortion law in Texas, which was struck down three years later. https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2016/07/18/hispanic-women-bore-brunt-of-texas-abortion-law-data-shows/
Donald Trump has reshaped the judiciary since 2016 — including his three #SCOTUS justices, all with histories of opposing abortion.

That, experts say, increases the odds of a Roe v. Wade challenge, with a ruling that scales back protections. https://bit.ly/34OE8z3 
Most recently, a Jan. 12 ruling prevented people from using telemedicine to get medication abortion pills, despite doctors arguing it's necessary during the pandemic.

Advocates say that ruling, as well as the Louisiana decision, are telling signs. https://bit.ly/2KCLO1g 
Without Roe v. Wade, experts imagine a patchwork of laws, where some states protect access, but others ban the procedure.

"It's already very divided. Access to abortion is hard in many states and very limited," said @KFF's Laurie Sobel.
You can follow @19thnews.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.