Read on Twitter
Not @-ing anyone in particular here, but it’s concerning how more and more digging we see into explaining the origins/infrastructure of Q and its spread sadly falls into the same trap Q followers did to begin with;
theories, no matter how compelling they are, remain just theories—unless of course they’re backed by solid evidence. It’s fine to have theories—I have a few of those, too—but even they should be anchored in at least some evidence.
It’s a crucial thing to remember at this present junction: some disenchanted QAnon followers are now embracing the ‘it was a psyop all along’ narrative and there’s a risk of them just falling into the same traps, only to take this in a new direction.
Recognizing fact-based evidence is the only way to break these cycles—and that’s something that applies to everyone.
