Read on Twitter
#BidenErasedWomen Biden hasn't erased women; he's kicked off a process for examining whether the ruling in Bostock should be applied elsewhere. This is an administrative process with ample ground to object if there's cause to do so. See the EO https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-preventing-and-combating-discrimination-on-basis-of-gender-identity-or-sexual-orientation/ https://twitter.com/SoniaPoulton/status/1352286487564447746
#BidenErasedWomen the key phrase in the EO is "laws that prohibit sex discrimination ... prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, so long as the laws do not contain sufficient indications to the contrary."
#BidenErasedWomen the EO directs agencies that enforce certain laws, including Title IX, the Fair Housing Act, and the Immigration and Nationality Act to review those laws and promulgate rules that incorporate the purpose of the EO
#BidenErasedWomen the APA allows interested persons to submit comments on proposed regulations; this is a process open to EVERYONE. See https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/laws/administrative-procedure
#BidenErasedWomen demonstrates that I will always make a lot of money to explain the law to paying clients, rather than waste my time on dumb ppl who don't understand what the law (in this case, the EO) says
#BidenErasedWomen if the EO makes you mad, find evidence in the legislative history of these laws that they were not meant to protect on the basis of S.O. or G.I.
I will discuss this further on Monday if you want to join https://www.facebook.com/events/755193208727469 #BidenErasedWomen
