Sounds like the Home Affairs Select Committee on Online Harms was pretty crunchy https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/jan/21/facebook-admits-encryption-will-harm-efforts-to-prevent-child-exploitation
Catching up now. Yvette Cooper takes the Google policy person to task on the role of YouTube in radicalisation and white supremacy straight away. @nickpickles meanwhile v clear on link between online and offline harms https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/37d045f1-26ff-4097-a693-fa0dd5083599
Worth reading in the context of this by Oliver Dowden, which draws a line between the Arab Spring and the storm on the Capitol, saying that the Online Harms Bill will bring transparency and consistency and reduce arbitary decisions https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/donald-trumps-twitter-ban-exposes-the-flaws-in-how-social-media-is-regulated-h2tswgv8l
*And* to contextualise that - always - important to revisit @zeynep’s Twitter and Tear Gas https://www.twitterandteargas.org/downloads/twitter-and-tear-gas-by-zeynep-tufekci.pdf
Listening to Nick Pickles now, I can't help but wonder if we're about to fall down a rabbit hole of everyone blaming everyone else, and not recognising interrelations and ecosystems. It's the partisan politicians and media! vs It's the platforms!
I won't tweet the whole thing on a 2-hour delay (hi fans!) but it's worth catching up with if you're thinking about and working on this.
I do love listening to Select Committees from home though. Such an overall win for democratic transparency to be able to do this.