okay, since absolutely no one seems to know what anarcho capitalism is, let me give a brief exposition. Anarcho-capitalism, as an ideological matter is the belief as such that everything that is scarce, should be left to the free association of peaceful men to be owned.

we believe that the state, as an institution is not only inefficient, but is the main centralised power as to aggress against our property rights, which defines the boundaries for conflict avoidance within said society. Without such defined boundaries, conflict would ensue.

we oppose all such action that aggresses against another’s property rights, as we view such as an act of aggression, and thus unjust. This includes such things as war, street warfare, conscription, involuntary commitment, etc. We believe people, as self owners should be free

to do as they wish with their own property, so long as it does not aggress against any other men. This includes drugs, prostitution, pornography, etc. So long as men own themselves, they may be free to do as they wish. We are strictly methodologically individualist

we oppose all forms of collectivism and polylogism. We believe all men, by virtue of their nature possess equal rights. Thus we entirely oppose such things as racism, slavery, feudalism, etc. When one man aggresses against another, he is necessarily stripped of such rights.

he no longer possesses that ownership of himself, as he has demonstrated he is incapable of recognising and considering another’s ownership. He only gains such rights back after he has been proportionally punished, this is a well founded method in history. Our legal emphasis is

not as the states is, on imprisonment but rather on returning such things to the victim. By this I mean restitution. If any man, let’s say robs another, he will be owed to provide the victim with say a proportional amount in cash that he stole and cover those legal fees that his

trial caused. we may note we also oppose such things as imprisoning any men before his trial, is as such that he is not determined guilty. We cannot imprison any men based off expectation of what they may do, this rules of such things as laws against ‘conspiracy’ laws.

this is a very basic and unsubstantiated overview to provide the very basics of libertarianism. All such propositions are grounded in mounds of literature and theory of my Austrian predecessors. If there is any questions one may have about libertarianism,

I am more than happy to try and answer such questions to the best of my ability.

to further note, not all such anarcho capitalists will agree with everything I have said. We depart from each other in very many areas, which is why you tend to see so much Austrian infighting. My position is a Rothbardian one as such.