Read on Twitter
Pashinyan: it is illogical for the ruling force to hold early elections if opposition representatives do not want it.
According to him, the opposition’s refusal means recognition of their potential defeat in the elections.
According to him, the opposition’s refusal means recognition of their potential defeat in the elections.
Pashinyan: why did the opposition not demand the resignation of the Armenian leaders when they negotiated previously and could not resolve the Karabakh conflict.
Pashinyan admitted that he had given the army orders to leave positions in Syunik: this decision was made for the security of the military and to ensure security in the region. He added that there was a danger of resumption of hostilities, and this decision saved the situation.
Pashinyan said that he did not respond to Aliyev's daring statements due to the fact that there are Armenian prisoners in Azerbaijan, adding that reciprocal statements may complicate the exchange of prisoners.
Pashinyan on captives: the number of captives is large, but if we look at it with similar logic, such number of captives have not been freed as they were after November 9. My question is the following, why haven't such questions been raised in the past? Knowing that the topic...
...of captives has always been on the agenda of Armenia. Why such questions have not been asked in the past when there were meetings with the Azerbaijanis and captives were not freed? Why were they [past governments] not asked to resign?
