Was doing some simple math to make sure @NEARProtocol's #EVM compares to #Ethereum one. @mattdlockyer, thanks for bringing this up!
Ethereum protocol has a block gas limit of ~12.5M EVM gas. One can schedule a single transaction of this size. In current prices (90 Gwei), a block costs 1.12 ETH, which is around $1.5k.
As a result, @NEARProtocol #EVM implementation supports transactions up to 1.7M EVM Gas with up to 8.6M EVM Gas block limit
Also, take into account, that NEAR block generation time is around 1 sec, while Ethereum's currently is 13 sec.
So, during the same timespan @NEARProtocol can do ~9 times more calculations than #Ethereum on a single EVM shard.
Should we worry about the transaction gas limit? In general, no: Ethereum blocks contain in the mean around 100 transactions: https://pirlea.net/2020/01/20/ethereum-usage-graphs/
Which means that the mean Ethereum transaction costs around 125k Gas. And this is 13.6 times lower than NEAR transaction gas limit
From the other side, the difference in prices is drastic:
@NEARProtocol's 1000 Tgas (block) would cost you around 0.1 NEAR, which is in current prices worth of $0.24.
This means that @NEARProtocol's #EVM calculations at the moment are 4300 times lower than Ethereum's. And what is more important, sharding will keep prices low even in #EVM environment (multiple EVM shards).
You can follow @ExonumAlex.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.