"precision farming simply does not fit with the forms of payments envisaged by the Commission in its legislative proposal."
These are:
✅payments additional to the basic income support
✅additional costs incurred and income foregone.
And yet, so-called precision farming+
is supposedly a solution to reduce production costs, increase efficiency and profits, improve resource management...

so

why should farmers be paid for the additional supposed costs incurred and income forgone?
😕🤷‍♀️🧐
And then there's animal welfare as a brand new eco-scheme option. If pigs can fly, they seem to have landed down to earth in eco-schemes.
"to use up eco-scheme money for the purposes of animal welfare means far less money for the areas eco-schemes were designed to help with."
"That this has come in so late, with seemingly no consultation, smacks of a Commissioner who has a well documented long and strong focus on animal welfare, shoehorning his own pet project into an area which clearly should not have it in there."
Literally a pet project @jwojc.
You can follow @ARC2020eu.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.