So many interesting themes to pull out from this thread on Q Anon👇

But just focusing the tweet below highlights a key issue: a disvalued social identity leads to initial participation in, and commitment to, social movements. Members won't see participation as "pathetic"

1/n https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1350893513081290754
Pervasive experiences of rejection and failure lead to a social identity that distinguishes between the stigmatised and the conventional.

Members are likely to identify as an "out group"; outcasts from the conventional world, which is rejected as invalid.

2/n
Participation in the "out group" signifies a rejection of the conventions upon which the individual judged him/herself to be the object of rejection.

QAnon provides an alternative mechanism; beyond the limit of what was once acceptable standards of behaviour, and offers

3/n
the promise of reducing the experience of self-rejection.

In essence, movements offer safety for bruised identities. Withdrawal from this creates conflict between collective identites and self-views, and risks even further rejection.

Aka, it's really hard!

4/4
Stryker, Owens & White's book "Self, Identity, and Social Movements" is highly recommended on this topic.
You can follow @McKenzie_L_S.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.