(1/n)

New paper from Alvaro Espitia, Aaditya Mattoo, Nadia Rocha, Michele Ruta & Deborah Winkler @WorldBank looking at COVID-19 & TRADE

Did global value chains leave sectors VULNERABLE to shocks, or PROTECT from them?

...it depends

http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/843301610630752625/pdf/Pandemic-Trade-Covid-19-Remote-Work-and-Global-Value-Chains.pdf
Turns out, pandemics are nooooooot great for trade

They correlate changes in mobility with export growth
As lockdowns spread, exports fell too

In the LHS column, blue dots (Feb)=>orange (March)=>red (April)

Then things recovered: red dots (April)=>green (May)=>yellow (June)
Similar story here with imports...
BUT. The pandemic was generally bad. Did exporters dependent on GVCs do WORSE?

They compare sectors that were more/less reliant on imported inputs

And they also look at different kinds of SHOCKS. Was the problem with overseas SUPPLIERS, or with ones at HOME?
They find that YES. Being dependent on foreign inputs means that your exports are relatively vulnerable to shocks from abroad. (That's the RHS bars.)

BUT it means you are relatively INSULATED from domestic shocks. (The LHS bars.)
And they conclude,

"Nationalization of production is not a solution: it would result in lower exposure to foreign shocks at the cost of higher exposure to domestic shocks." (/end)
You can follow @SoumayaKeynes.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.